From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't concat directories to file names Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wsy6cvip.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k5u5cydi.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874pl9tbnj.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182151576 29524 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2007 07:26:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, stephen@xemacs.org, miles@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 09:26:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I0Bcr-0004pf-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:26:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0Bcq-0000hI-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0BcF-0000OS-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0BcD-0000Nf-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0BcD-0000NY-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I0BcD-0004Qr-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I0BcB-000158-4N; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:25:31 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:36:15 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73216 Archived-At: > I don't think anyone will care if they are different, but if so, > someone can make an alias. I do care. So do a few others on this list. Can you present a reason why it matters whether this variable has the same name in Emacs and XEmacs? Which programs would need such compatibility?