From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elib -> emacs Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200706160029.l5G0Tv318102@f7.net> <200706162119.49853.andreas.roehler@online.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182116975 17223 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2007 21:49:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 17 23:49:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I02cn-00084l-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:49:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I02cm-0001N7-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I02cI-00016O-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I02cH-000164-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I02cH-00015z-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I02cG-00082r-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I02cG-0002qO-Ev; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <200706162119.49853.andreas.roehler@online.de> (message from Andreas =?utf-8?q?R=C3=B6hler?= on Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:19:48 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73172 Archived-At: For me it doesn't seem a good idea to drop elib.el, unless it's proven buggy. Some of its functionality is already in Emacs. Emacspeak is not a sharp issue, since the relevant files of elib have been copied into it. http://emacspeak.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/lisp/elib-readme says: This directory includes stack-f.el and string.el from Elib 1.0. Can you email me those two files? If they are useful enough, we could add them to Emacs. What other elib features do programs such as Emacspeak still use?