From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development?
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:35 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HvRQF-0003vM-2N@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <ud50bv7gz.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181020742 9278 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2007 05:19:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:19:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 07:19:00 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HvRRa-0000uW-9m
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:18:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRRY-0005WL-VF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQf-00047j-Is
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:01 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQe-000466-1o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvRQd-00045m-Qd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:59 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HvRQd-0000Cm-4F
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:59 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HvRQF-0003vM-2N; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:35 -0400
In-reply-to: <ud50bv7gz.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 04
	Jun 2007 22:35:08 +0300)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72258
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/72258>

    FWIW, I don't think we should merge changes that are safe until some
    time has passed and we have some kind of idea about how buggy v22.1
    is.  If the number of problems we hear on bug-gnu-emacs is large, then
    we should stabilize 22.x before we merge changes that can potentially
    destabilize it.

We need to see, first of all, how many problems are reported in 22.1.
We don't know how many Emacs 22 releases will be needed at all.