From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS is the `released version' Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:02:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86646mjvxp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <2cd46e7f0705251413y975af0bwbd7c6709814fd915@mail.gmail.com> <85wsywysob.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180396985 11110 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2007 00:03:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 02:03:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HspB0-0005CG-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2007 02:03:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HspB0-0002P3-HW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 20:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HspAy-0002Oy-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 20:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HspAx-0002Om-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 20:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HspAx-0002Oj-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 20:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HspAx-0003BN-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2007 20:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HspAk-0001Ka-LA; Mon, 28 May 2007 20:02:46 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from dhruva on Mon, 28 May 2007 08:40:25 +0530) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71908 Archived-At: Is it feasible/practical to have a keyword in the comment area of the file "providing" the package with list of depedencies and their locations? If the locations are not given, we could assume that it in the same location where the main package is hosted OR is part of emacs distro. It should be just names, not locations. I agree this should be easy.