From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Stephen.Berman@gmx.net: Re: redisplay] Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:41:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mz0z5dux.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <462D059B.7020001@swipnet.se> <87d51u211n.fsf@escher.local.home> <20070424.075017.71197070.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> <87lkgergy1.fsf@escher.local.home> <85odl7hb3x.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177883465 27584 80.91.229.12 (29 Apr 2007 21:51:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 29 23:51:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HiHIO-0000Rj-72 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:51:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHOV-0005Ca-0N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHHg-0002IY-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:50:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHHf-0002I7-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHHf-0002Hf-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:50:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HiHBX-00053d-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:44:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HiH8q-0006kl-1L; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:41:12 -0400 In-reply-to: <85odl7hb3x.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:51:30 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70377 Archived-At: I see a gross flaw in installing "almost certain improvements" in a central area of Emacs when we are trying to pin down a final release. The improvement in question consists of at least partly fixing a bug.