From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:40:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871wi9jw37.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <462E7B94.3000008@gnu.org> <462F0A07.50104@gnu.org> <864pn4an8j.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86zm4w97du.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> <20070427133832.22F374DD5F@rocksteady.printf.se> <20070428185245.286FD4DD5F@rocksteady.printf.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177883013 26319 80.91.229.12 (29 Apr 2007 21:43:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Henrik Enberg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 29 23:43:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HiHB3-00060y-5z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHH9-0001sx-TZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHH6-0001si-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHH5-0001sH-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiHH5-0001sC-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HiHAy-0004wZ-94 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:43:24 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HiH8G-0006fq-Sb; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:40:36 -0400 In-reply-to: <20070428185245.286FD4DD5F@rocksteady.printf.se> (message from Henrik Enberg on Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:52:45 +0200 (CEST)) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70372 Archived-At: Would it be acceptable to do like Eli suggested, name the display buffer e.g. RMAIL and keep the actual mailbox file in another, possibly hidden buffer. The results might be acceptable if this were made to work smoothly, but I think that would be likely to be a lot of work.