From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:59:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871wi9jw37.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <462E7B94.3000008@gnu.org> <462F0A07.50104@gnu.org> <864pn4an8j.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86zm4w97du.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177653843 15483 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2007 06:04:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: henrik.enberg@telia.com, eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 27 08:04:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HhJYm-0001rK-PD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:04:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJeb-0007NM-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJcq-0006DP-L1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJcp-0006Cd-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJcp-0006CS-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhJWz-0008E2-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhJUK-0003RM-GE; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:59:24 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:06:40 +0900) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70222 Archived-At: I agree. As Gnus, the decoded message should be shown in the different buffer than RMAIL buffer. No thanks. That would be inconvenient in various ways.