From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:59:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871wi9jw37.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <462E7B94.3000008@gnu.org> <462F0A07.50104@gnu.org> <864pn4an8j.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86zm4w97du.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177653751 15257 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2007 06:02:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Henrik Enberg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 27 08:02:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HhJXH-0001HL-Rn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:02:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJd6-0006Le-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJcR-00061q-9S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJcQ-00061T-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhJcQ-00061Q-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhJWb-00088E-Ht for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhJTw-0003NC-RM; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:59:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> (message from Henrik Enberg on Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:50:26 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70219 Archived-At: * Gnus BABYL support will break. Since the new Rmail no longer knows how to decode BABYL, neither will Gnus. This is unfortunate, but more or less unavoidable, given the way Rmail is designed. Gnus should covert Babyl files into mailbox files. (So should Rmail, I guess.) The unrmail command, plus the old code for reading Babyl files, ought to suffice for this. That is the only kind of support for Babyl files that we can retain in the Rmail-inbox code. It would be too much of a pain to try to support actually editing both formats.