From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:05:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <462E310C.20400@yandex.ru> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177466982 3822 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2007 02:09:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 04:09:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgWwt-0003b8-J4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:09:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgX2S-0004fK-QO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:15:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgX0o-0003PP-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgX0o-0003Oi-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgX0n-0003O3-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgWvD-0002Oi-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgWsc-0001bY-3u; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:05:14 -0400 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70040 Archived-At: ELISP> (eq (substring "ab" 0) (substring "ab" 0)) nil ELISP> (eq (substring "ab" 1) (substring "ab" 1)) nil ELISP> (eq (substring "ab" 2) (substring "ab" 2)) t That doesn't seem a nice behaviour. Any program that _depends_ on eq to return nil in the last case is taking a risk.