From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes to hi-lock before release.
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:46:34 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HfQDq-0001nO-Ji@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <7wejmekgrd.fsf@ece.lsu.edu> <E1HfGbN-0006PL-IH@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87zm51ab0b.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177202968 10318 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2007 00:49:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:49:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: koppel@ece.lsu.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 22 02:49:22 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HfQGV-0000LM-Qe
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:49:20 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfQLj-0002lt-L2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:54:43 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfQLf-0002kR-2R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:54:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfQLd-0002jr-Jn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:54:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfQLd-0002jo-BM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:54:37 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HfQGO-0005Hm-PT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:49:12 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HfQDq-0001nO-Ji; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:46:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <87zm51ab0b.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:32:52 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69755
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69755>

    >     +(defvar hi-lock-file-patterns-policy 'never
    >
    > Shouldn't that be a defcustom?
    > It should also have a risky-local-variable property
    > since its value can be a function.

    Let's just keep things as they are for now.

It makes no sense to put in a variable for user customization without
making it a defcustom.  Would someone please make it a defcustom?