From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Current Emacs crashes on HPUX
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:02:07 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HZ63r-0002cV-5w@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <etrian$hg5$1@sea.gmane.org> <864poeoc05.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
	<etrjvs$p66$1@sea.gmane.org> <dbtzwesdqg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<11y7lq2wwu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <nwzm64k696.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2mz24fc4p.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de> <m2fy7te48w.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
	<4iodmfqukv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <m2veglo63f.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
	<E1HWwd4-0000mq-5y@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2ircj273r.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de> <iw7iszygz3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2y7lfkukc.fsf_-_@kenny.sha-bang.de>
	<m2lkhelrd5.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
	<E1HXXry-000087-L4@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2zm5piz2o.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175695540 26827 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2007 14:05:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:05:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jbuehler@spirentcom.com
To: Sascha Wilde <wilde@sha-bang.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 04 16:05:35 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HZ66d-0007kX-Uq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:05:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HZ69u-0003YB-02
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:08:22 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HZ69M-0003HP-8H
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:07:48 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HZ69L-0003H7-PD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:07:47 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ69L-0003Gz-J7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:07:47 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HZ664-0006gI-O2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:04:24 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HZ63r-0002cV-5w; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:02:07 -0400
In-reply-to: <m2zm5piz2o.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de> (message from Sascha Wilde on
	Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:31:27 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69046
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69046>

    >     Another interesting observation -- I don't know if it is of any
    >     relevance, emacs 21 (working) was linked against xcurses library,
    >     while the 22 isn't:
    >
    > You could try linking Emacs 22 with xcurses.  Does that work?

    Unforunatly, no.  I made a complete rebuild with libtermcap replaced
    by libxcurses, but the resulting binary still crashes like before.

Well, at least we know that xcurses probably isn't relevant.