From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:20:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <460583AD.7010002@gmail.com> <85abxxw46j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85y7lfsxso.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <460D6AA1.4050704@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175325855 25745 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2007 07:24:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 31 09:24:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXXwW-0007gN-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:24:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXXzH-0003ec-OG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:26:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXXxZ-00033g-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXXxY-00033K-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXXxY-00033D-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HXXuk-00060s-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HXXsY-0001B7-5d; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:20:02 -0400 In-reply-to: <460D6AA1.4050704@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68818 Archived-At: > Can we just leave this alone for Emacs 22? There is no actual problem > we are trying to fix, other than the general sentiment that changes > produced by display-warning should not be undoable. I don't see any > harm in the current behaviour, and there seems to be no good, simple > solution. It is not a big problem, but perhaps it would then be best to just disable undo in the *Warnings* buffer? I agree.