From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: transpose-regions Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:56:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <46026277.7060305@gmx.at> <87zm64kau0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ircst5jn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175057969 17376 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2007 04:59:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, storm@cua.dk To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 28 06:59:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HWQFl-00069k-BZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:59:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWQIB-0003Vv-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:01:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWQHc-0002jF-0S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWQHb-0002id-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:01:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWQHb-0002iO-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWQF9-0002qU-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:58:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWQCt-0001Bc-4a; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:56:23 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:50:34 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68699 Archived-At: I can see that, but given the fact that it's only used interactively (where the performance impact is likely to be unnoticeable) or in gnus/deuglify.el and game/tetris.el, I think the that performance gains do not justify the pain and risk of writing and optimizing it in C. I don't agree.