From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest? Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:43:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87slcf8qxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20070309135920.GA3560@kobe.laptop> <87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173754079 32085 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2007 02:47:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 03:47:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HQx3G-0003yo-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:47:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQx3z-0008RK-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQx21-00072V-Hm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:46:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HQx20-00071y-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:46:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HQx20-00071r-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:46:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQx1G-00071l-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:45:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HQwzT-0001gK-TC; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:43:55 -0400 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67834 Archived-At: If you don't mind, I'd like to reach a consensus with respect to the emacsclient / isearch discussion in emacs-pretest-bugs. The proposed patch is tiny (seven lines plus comments), but the issue is larger, as it seems like Richard doesn't like emacsclient / server "forcibly exit[ing] the minibuffer" or "interfer[ing] with isearch". I think that in cases like this server.el should display the new buffer in another window, so that the user knows to go over and edit it. But server.el should not mess up the command that is being executed.