From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: read-file-name-predicate
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:16:14 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HP970-00085g-5p@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMGEJHCPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173323957 31198 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2007 03:19:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 03:19:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 08 04:19:07 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HP99n-000535-3G
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:19:07 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HP99w-00055t-Kn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:16 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HP98s-0004gJ-TP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:18:10 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HP98s-0004fR-7K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:18:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HP98r-0004fH-Qz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:18:09 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HP98h-0007Z3-C3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:17:59 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HP970-00085g-5p; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:16:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMGEJHCPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67551
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67551>

    My point is that it is currently entre deux chaises. Either 1) it
    should be, as it is, accessible from Lisp, in which case it should
    be documented, or 2) it should be inaccessible from Lisp. (Yes, I
    do realize that not everything that is accessible from Lisp is
    documented.)

This is not a bug.  We should leave this alone, drop the subject, and
focus our attention on fixing bugs.