From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Emacs pretest bug reports
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:36:33 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HOiGn-0000sX-3Q@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173220801 1732 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2007 22:40:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:40:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 06 23:39:54 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HOiK1-0000mm-Q4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:39:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HOiK2-00074d-Kt
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:39:54 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HOiIV-00069M-VP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:38:20 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HOiIV-00068b-FJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:38:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOiIV-00068I-64
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:38:19 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HOiIT-00061U-8R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:38:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HOiGn-0000sX-3Q; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:36:33 -0500
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67446
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67446>

There is a suggestion that we make emacs-pretest-bug an alias for
emacs-devel.  That means pretest bug reports will come here first.

Does anyone think this is a bad idea?