From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: My Emacs unicode 2 crash again when I do some *Replace String (M-%)*, I give the debug informations under gdb in the attachments. Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:06:35 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20070306063056.GA21948@debian-testing-hy.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173168427 14543 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2007 08:07:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Hongyi Zhao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 06 09:06:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HOUhF-0006PH-2N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:06:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOUhF-0006wg-Rq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOUh3-0006wP-R2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:06:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOUh0-0006wB-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:06:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOUh0-0006w8-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:06:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HOUgz-0002mF-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:06:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id l2686a79010187; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:06:36 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id l2686age009983; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:06:36 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id l2686ZN8002845; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:06:35 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HOUgt-0006an-7Y; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:06:35 +0900 In-reply-to: <20070306063056.GA21948@debian-testing-hy.localdomain> (message from Hongyi Zhao on Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:30:56 +0800) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.95 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67411 Archived-At: By the way, > abnormally. The debug-results-gdb is my debug informations under > gdb. It shows this info: Breakpoint 1, abort () at emacs.c:431 431 kill (getpid (), SIGABRT); (gdb) bt full #0 abort () at emacs.c:431 No locals. #1 0x08085a09 in try_window_id (w=0x8b927f0) at xdisp.c:15191 The function try_window_id has this code: try_window_id (w) struct window *w; { [...] /* Update window_end_pos and window_end_vpos. */ if (first_unchanged_at_end_row && !last_text_row_at_end) [...] else if (last_text_row_at_end) [...] else if (last_text_row) [...] else if (first_unchanged_at_end_row == NULL && last_text_row == NULL && last_text_row_at_end == NULL) [...] else abort (); <-- line 15191 [...] } So it's impossible to reach the line 15191 with any combination of values of these three variables: first_unchanged_at_end_vpos last_text_row last_text_row_at_end Is it GCC bug? Which version of GCC have you used? --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org