From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: find-file for file that was deleted,
	when visiting buffer still exists
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:50:49 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HOL4z-0005fC-2g@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMAEIBCPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173131760 17170 80.91.229.12 (5 Mar 2007 21:56:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:56:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 05 22:55:52 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HOL9r-0005uC-BH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:55:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HOL9r-0007MI-3S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:55:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HOL6f-0006AQ-5f
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:52:33 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HOL6e-0006A5-LR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:52:32 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOL6e-0006A1-A1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:52:32 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HOL6d-0006AW-R6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:52:31 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HOL4z-0005fC-2g; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:50:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMAEIBCPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67382
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67382>

    > Perhaps it should visit the buffer foo, and give a warning that the
    > file no longer exists.  That seems better to me.  Does anyone
    > disagree?

I did that.