From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:00:44 -0500 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172973803 30928 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2007 02:03:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 04 03:03:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HNg49-0003wr-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:03:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg49-00056s-Cm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:03:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3O-0004nh-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3N-0004nG-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3N-0004nA-7e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HNg3M-0003Pj-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HNg1k-0002n6-DG; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:00:44 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 15:22:50 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67280 Archived-At: I mostly use very fast (3 Ghz) machines nowadays, which are not easily forced into annoying delays. I could try to find a slower machine, but I need to know what is the clock speed we consider as ``reference'' for such investigations. That is, with what slow clock speeds we would still like Emacs to be reasonably responsive? I don't know. I have not kept track of things like that for 15 years. But I think that if NONE of the developers now finds this annoying, that problem will be rare enough that it doesn't count for much. So we can set jit-lock-stealth-time to nil. Would someone please do that?