From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `key-binding' and XEmacs-style events Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <36817.128.165.123.18.1172703473.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <38667.128.165.123.18.1172788075.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <85irdk9gnp.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85wt1y3hcv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172973773 30878 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2007 02:02:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 04 03:02:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HNg3g-0003lb-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:02:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3g-0004rY-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3F-0004jj-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3E-0004jK-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNg3E-0004jC-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HNg3D-0003Mv-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:02:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HNg1b-0002lE-2y; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:00:35 -0500 In-reply-to: <85wt1y3hcv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 08:40:16 +0100) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67279 Archived-At: > A list as a member of a key sequence has no meaning except > in terms of XEmacs compatibility, so I think confusion is not > possible. key-binding can be called with a mouse event inside of a key sequence vector. That was what the problem report was about in the first place. I stand corrected -- but the original problem report was not about a mouse event, it was about using a character inside a list. The car of a mouse event list is a symbol. If the recent fix does not alter what is done when the car is a symbol, it should not alter treatment of mouse events. Isn't that so?