From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:27:41 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HMJDx-0003jE-H8@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<E1HLWWC-0005Fu-Hq@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvy7mlsens.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HLlu0-0006gw-Dz@fencepost.gnu.org> <uveho3cd3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1HLwvb-0001tq-Ja@fencepost.gnu.org> <ur6sb2uws.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172647840 3015 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 07:30:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:30:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 08:30:33 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HMJGh-0005gH-Qn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:30:32 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMJGi-0005lB-12
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:30:32 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMJFX-0005FA-FA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:29:19 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMJFW-0005Ed-K9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:29:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMJFV-0005EU-V4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:29:18 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMJFV-0004r4-MJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:29:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HMJDx-0003jE-H8; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:27:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <ur6sb2uws.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 27
	Feb 2007 22:43:47 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66997
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66997>

    I was talking from memory.  I will make some measurements in a few
    days and tell the results.

I am not sure measurements are relevant here.  The question is
whether the delays avoided by stealth fontification bother you.
If you don't notice them, they don't bother you.

Do they bother you?