From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:38:51 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HLwvD-0001r6-1s@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<jwv4pp9ttxe.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<jemz31b4p2.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<jeirdpb326.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172562177 9519 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 07:42:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:42:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 08:42:51 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HLwz4-0007nR-IA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:42:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLwz4-0003SR-1V
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:42:50 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLwwl-0002a0-DB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:27 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLwwk-0002Zc-Qm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:26 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLwwk-0002ZL-MG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:26 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLwwk-000390-92
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:26 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HLwvD-0001r6-1s; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:38:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <jeirdpb326.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on
	Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:56:01 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66904
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66904>

More discussion of who has, and who has not, been inconvenienced by
stealth fontification is not really useful, because we already know
that it is a substantial inconvenience for some users.

The question now is whether it _avoids_ a substantial inconvenience
for a substantial fraction of users.