From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: removing bushdb related code in gud.el
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:53:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HLluN-0006ku-77@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20070226.024211.256833758.jet@gyve.org>
	<E1HLWWX-0005JI-SQ@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<6cd6de210702252026o58f3ed20jebc0e6c3f29da446@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172519808 23342 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 19:56:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:56:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jet@gyve.org, bashdb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 20:56:42 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HLlxO-00048m-OI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:56:22 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLlxO-0001A0-9Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:56:22 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLlvy-0000jK-7z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:54 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLlvx-0000iq-08
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:53 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLlvw-0000il-Ol
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:52 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLlvw-0007BY-Eb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:52 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HLluN-0006ku-77; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:53:15 -0500
In-reply-to: <6cd6de210702252026o58f3ed20jebc0e6c3f29da446@mail.gmail.com>
	(rocky.bernstein@gmail.com)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66873
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66873>

I think I understand the situation now.  Since bashdb support
was not included in Emacs 21, I think it is ok to remove it now.

But first I want to see if anyone argues against it.