From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix needed for communication with gpg-agent Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:06:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87irdzs6pp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy91g1pl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87wt2dk2rv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <873b4yt7xx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ps82ukz8.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <87slcynii0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172376566 8100 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2007 04:09:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 04:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wk@gnupg.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, miles@gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sascha Wilde Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 25 05:09:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLAhJ-0004fa-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 05:09:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLAhJ-0005KH-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLAfw-0004sJ-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLAfv-0004rm-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLAfv-0004rg-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLAfu-0000IK-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HLAeO-0008Ju-MI; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 23:06:16 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Sascha Wilde on Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:41:34 +0100) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66774 Archived-At: But there are still some more subtle security problems left, which IIRC were discussed in the original thread, too: If emacs caches the passphrase there is no way to protect the passphrase from being written to swap, when the system decides to swap out parts of emacs. If we turn off caching of the passphrase in Emacs, does this problem go away?