From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: More visible mini-buffer prompt face
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:36:37 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HKgDd-0005fi-7M@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <45DF1547.8010404@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172259545 25528 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2007 19:39:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:39:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 23 20:38:57 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HKgFs-0000P4-Nf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:38:56 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKgFs-0007sc-C9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:38:56 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKgF7-0007fr-Kc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:38:09 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HKgF6-0007fL-Tw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:38:09 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKgF6-0007fC-JU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:38:08 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HKgF6-0006Vd-8C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:38:08 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HKgDd-0005fi-7M; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:36:37 -0500
In-reply-to: <45DF1547.8010404@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66701
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66701>

    I wonder if it would not be better to have a more visible face for the 
    minibuffer prompt by default. My suggestion would be using a visible 
    background color (some not too sharp yellow perhaps).

What color do you get now?
Which of the options in the defface is being used?
Could you propose a patch in that defface?