From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation of constants in LISP Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:44:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <23847250.4061170433063829.JavaMail.www@wwinf4103> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172018788 10071 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2007 00:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se (Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd?=) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 21 01:46:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HJfci-0006nZ-8r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:46:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJfch-00063i-TL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:46:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HJfcW-00063c-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HJfcV-00063Q-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJfcV-00063N-8z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HJfcU-0005H2-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJfb4-00085R-NZ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:44:38 -0500 In-reply-to: (bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66563 Archived-At: These problems show that the patch that was installed is no good in its current form. We have to revert the change, it unless these problems are fixed quickly. However, the idea may still be a good one if it is implemented differently. (prog2 x :y z) That doesn't seem like a real case. (defcustom var :val :group foo) The special case check for the second line of a def... form should override this special case check. (foo :a b :c d :e f) That is a bug, but I tend to think it can be fixed locally. (foo a :b c d :e f) Likewise. Perhaps the check for a previous keyword should look at most 2 args back. Then it would reject this case.