From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NT icons Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:04:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8764a7oxbu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87wt2i5688.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878xev1m6i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <858xevi94j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171908450 1901 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2007 18:07:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 19 19:07:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HJCv3-0005g3-ET for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:07:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJCv3-0003nF-0W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:07:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HJCtv-0003IB-BT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HJCtu-0003HK-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJCtu-0003H4-Er for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HJCtu-0003E4-A6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJCsV-000551-Bj; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:04:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <858xevi94j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:00:28 +0100) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66531 Archived-At: We have on file in copyright.list EMACS Lucid, Inc. 1992-07-01 Assigns changes to Emacs. So it would seem that we have lwlib covered. I don't think that lwlib counts as a change to Emacs. (I don't think it was written specifically for Emacs.) This is why the copyright notices were not changed from Lucid to FSF. I asked a lawyer for advice about certain points regarding those files.