From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: constant `e'
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:41:09 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HFwDl-0000ag-Bs@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BDEIJAFNGDOAGCJIPKPBMEIOCCAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<87ireah6ia.fsf@wigwam.brockman.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171129467 14561 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2007 17:44:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 10 18:44:25 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HFwGv-0005BU-8O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:44:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HFwGu-00020M-N9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:44:24 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HFwEz-0000vL-Sx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:42:25 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HFwEz-0000uv-7F
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:42:25 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFwEz-0000uo-0L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:42:25 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HFwEy-0008WU-8c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:42:24 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HFwDl-0000ag-Bs; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:41:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <87ireah6ia.fsf@wigwam.brockman.se> (message from Daniel Brockman
	on Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:27:25 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66223
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66223>

    Seriously, though, I'd really like to see an `otherwise'
    constant (defined to `t', of course).  That would make
    catch-all clauses of `cond' look much better.

We won't do this, so please let's not spend time discussing it.