From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: fundamental-mode-hook
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:23:00 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HFWeS-00067H-Q4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <45CA70FA.6020002@gmail.com> <877iutvu8v.fsf@floss.red-bean.com>
	<45CA7955.1020602@gmail.com> <E1HFFDo-0004Et-Kv@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<45CBA462.8040801@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171031120 25995 80.91.229.12 (9 Feb 2007 14:25:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 09 15:25:09 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HFWgF-0007Fa-D2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:24:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HFWgE-0002CI-Pa
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:50 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HFWff-0001mC-4h
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:15 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HFWfe-0001lM-Hn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFWfe-0001l7-9K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:14 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HFWfd-0005Ld-V7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:24:14 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HFWeS-00067H-Q4; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:23:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <45CBA462.8040801@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66161
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66161>

    Yes, thanks, that is what I thought. What is the right way to find out 
    if a function is a major mode?

I think there is no reliable way.

In a future version we could add a way.