From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: copyrights to be fixed Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:37:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <34ps8nirvt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874ppy6g53.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170812404 28307 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2007 01:40:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 07 02:40:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEbmy-0003hj-03 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:40:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEbmx-0006L6-PZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEbm5-0005kX-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEbm4-0005jk-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEbm3-0005jX-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HEbm2-00082P-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HEbku-00012W-UM; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:37:52 -0500 In-reply-to: <874ppy6g53.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:05:44 -0500) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66059 Archived-At: gnus-logo.eps This is a straightforward conversion of the Gnu Emacs logo to EPS format, used by a couple of reference cards. I don't think it counts as a creative work. More precisely, if your description is accurate, no extra creativity went into deriving it from the other form of the Emacs logo, and we do have papers for that. Is this all the "gnus logo" refers to? So there really is no separate logo for Gnus? If so, that term "gnus logo" is misleading: this is the Emacs logo. We should stop using the term "gnus logo" if there isn't actually a different logo for Gnus. letter.pbm letter.xpm These are simple images whose source code consists of three short lines. They should not be considered creative works. We can keep them.