From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Image mode
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:37:51 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HEbkt-00012B-JS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> <E1HE9EM-0005b3-GP@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m2mz3sxpoq.fsf@gmail.com> <E1HETof-00064d-5N@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<85zm7qzylz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170812376 28207 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2007 01:39:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 01:39:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, dooglus@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 07 02:39:27 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HEbmR-0003Rg-AV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 02:39:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HEbmR-0005sd-48
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:27 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HEbm2-0005iz-Qn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:02 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HEbm2-0005i4-8C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:02 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEbm2-0005hw-1P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:02 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HEbm1-000823-Hf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:39:01 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HEbkt-00012B-JS; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:37:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <85zm7qzylz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:54:00 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66058
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66058>

    > Not necessarily.  You might not even know what an image library is.
    > The only conclusion we can reliably draw is that you trust display of
    > the image.

    Well, so what?  If we don't consider the user's trust relevant, 

I don't know what you mean by "consider the user's trust relevant".
I cannot say, now, whether I am in favor it or against it.
I certainly said nothing either for or against it in the message
you are responding to.

So I think you're arguing against something I did not say.