all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: "Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:16:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HEE0l-0004T8-6F@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7ccd24b0702050308i5e034e21p230d516fc3071b61@mail.gmail.com> (lekktu@gmail.com)

    the function), but I think this piece of docstring is a bit confusing

      This function tries to undo modifications made by the package to
      hooks.  Packages may define a hook FEATURE-unload-hook that is called
      instead of the normal heuristics for doing this.  Such a hook should
      undo all the relevant global state changes that may have been made by
      loading the package or executing functions in it.

    because if you miss the "to hooks" (two words), as I did in several
    readings, it seems like it is saying that either you define
    FEATURE-unload-hook, or else it uses "the normal heuristics".

I agree, let's clarify this -- in the doc string and in the Lisp
manual.  Would someone like to try it?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-06  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-04 18:03 unload-feature questions and thoughts Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-04 18:32 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-04 19:07   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-04 19:14     ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05  0:10       ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05  7:21         ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05  9:21           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05  9:32             ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05 11:08               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05 11:16                 ` David Kastrup
2007-02-05 11:40                   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-06  0:16                 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2007-10-10 11:04                 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-10 14:52                   ` Davis Herring
2007-10-10 16:08                     ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-10 17:03                       ` Davis Herring
2007-10-10 17:07                         ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-10 17:56                           ` Davis Herring
2007-10-11  5:20                             ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-11  6:39                             ` David Kastrup
2007-10-11 15:16                               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-12 15:59                                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-12 17:01                                   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-13  6:41                                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-13 10:03                                       ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-14 16:28                                         ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-14 22:34                                           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-15 16:03                                             ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-15 16:22                                               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-16  4:10                                                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-16  8:15                                                   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-17  5:02                                                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-17 23:39                                                       ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-23 19:27                                           ` Davis Herring
2007-10-24  8:32                                             ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-11 16:41                               ` Davis Herring
2007-10-12  2:46                               ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-25 21:24                                 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-28 13:51                                   ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-10 21:03                   ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-10 21:42                     ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-05 19:10 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-05 23:27   ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-06 17:09     ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1HEE0l-0004T8-6F@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.