From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: URL not following some 302 redirects after recent changes
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:19:27 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HDIvX-0004lu-Rs@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <871wnw2opm.fsf@x3y2z1.net> <87tzy7wbsj.fsf@x3y2z1.net>
	<87bqkek9s7.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HCwYt-0006K1-M2@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwv8xfg605s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<86bqkcsgv5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170501697 16602 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2007 11:21:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:21:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, mange@freemail.hu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	disumu@x3y2z1.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 03 12:21:29 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HDIxV-0001Bm-5N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 12:21:29 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIxU-0003QF-Ja
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:21:28 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIwb-0002nt-PG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:33 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HDIwb-0002nW-0y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDIwa-0002nP-Pn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:32 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HDIwa-00076U-Ji
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:20:32 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HDIvX-0004lu-Rs; Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:19:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <86bqkcsgv5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:45:34 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65819
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65819>

    Instead of using `sentinel-temporarily-inhibited' I'd probably prefer
    `ignore'.

`ignore' is probably not a useful filter function, but it is not
absurd.  I would rather use a special symbol which doesn't mean
anything else.  Or some other object that is meaningless as a sentinel,
such as the number 0.