From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bind next-error and previous-error in Occur mode?   read-only?
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:09:52 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HAHTM-0008OI-GA@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BDEIJAFNGDOAGCJIPKPBAECMCCAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169781084 32757 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2007 03:11:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 26 04:11:21 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HAHUn-0006T5-4I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:11:21 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HAHUm-00062I-I6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:11:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HAHUE-0005hz-CA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:10:46 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HAHUD-0005gr-Pa
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:10:45 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HAHUD-0005gZ-BE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:10:45 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HAHUD-0008TS-1r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:10:45 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HAHTM-0008OI-GA; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:09:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <BDEIJAFNGDOAGCJIPKPBAECMCCAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65472
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65472>

    Now that `next-error' and `previous-error' work with `occur', why not bind
    them to easy-to-hit keys in Occur mode?

Let's not think about this now.