From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: hack-local-variables-confirm loops forever when running
	keyboard macro
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:07:29 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H9B4L-0002pI-Ho@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1H8WWI-0001Sx-KD@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87fya3rlzw.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169518181 25800 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2007 02:09:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 03:09:34 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H9B6L-0005VF-I9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:09:33 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H9B6L-0003MT-60
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:09:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H9B59-0001uw-Pz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:08:19 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H9B58-0001u7-TG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:08:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9B58-0001tk-NF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:08:18 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H9B57-0002Td-Pn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:08:18 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H9B4L-0002pI-Ho; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:07:29 -0500
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <87fya3rlzw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:48:19 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65398
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65398>

    > Would someone please fix this, then ack?

    I don't think any fix is necessary---one simply ought to be careful
    when defining keyboard macros to avoid situations like this.

What happens with other queries from C-x f, when it is used in a
keyboard macro?  Does it do the same thing?