From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:49:40 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H537U-0006gA-1c@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <13019191.885041168301149016.JavaMail.root@vms172.mailsrvcs.net>
	<m2ps9p9eze.fsf@gmail.com> <45A59E12.5030003@verizon.net>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168534253 28173 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2007 16:50:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dooglus@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org, md5i@cs.cmu.edu,
	storm@cua.dk, eliz@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 17:50:43 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H538K-0006dz-IZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:50:32 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H538K-0001up-A2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:50:32 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H5382-0001qo-HT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:50:14 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H5381-0001pX-JP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:50:13 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H5381-0001pE-FN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:50:13 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H5381-0008Qj-6E
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:50:13 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H537U-0006gA-1c; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:49:40 -0500
Original-To: Kevin Gallagher <kevin.gal@verizon.net>
In-reply-to: <45A59E12.5030003@verizon.net> (message from Kevin Gallagher on
	Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:16:50 -0600)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65147
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65147>

Do these articles shed any light on the question of where the Windows bindings
of C-x, C-c and C-v got started?