From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: C file recoginzed as image file
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:08:54 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H48IA-0004Fo-L5@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <loom.20070105T152213-693@post.gmane.org>	<m23b6pzg3g.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m2y7ohy0s1.fsf@gmail.com>	<f7ccd24b0701051102n4866b1cbi35465c3a22291ba4@mail.gmail.com>	<jwvlkkgyhcv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1H3OzT-0001gy-8M@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvzm8vwg89.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1H3n7j-0003vK-7u@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvfyalsgw2.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<m38xgdilqc.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<uejq5i9ku.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvslel2lpe.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<45A2D32A.8020804@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168315822 4346 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2007 04:10:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:10:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dooglus@gmail.com, lekktu@gmail.com, c.a.rendle@gmail.com,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk, eliz@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 05:10:20 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H48JU-0007ud-1f
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:10:16 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H48JT-00049j-ET
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:10:15 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H48If-0003PK-Pu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:09:25 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H48Ie-0003Nm-KP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:09:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H48Ie-0003NZ-Du
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:09:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H48Ie-0007Ze-2e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:09:24 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H48IA-0004Fo-L5; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:08:54 -0500
Original-To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <45A2D32A.8020804@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65039
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65039>

    Shouldn't we use 
    libraries that are already there on the platform (if that is possible) 
    to make this easier?

I do not understand what this suggestion means.  I would
like to understand.

Could you please explain more clearly what you are advocating, and
also, what the alternative is which you are arguing against?