From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pp-eval-expression broken Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:46:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168141706 21996 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2007 03:48:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 07 04:48:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H3P1E-0002a1-BK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:48:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3P1D-0005hL-NV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:48:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H3Ozv-0004bc-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H3Ozu-0004bA-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3Ozu-0004b3-NF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H3Ozu-0001lk-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1H3OzU-0001h8-JP; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:46:36 -0500 Original-To: "Drew Adams" In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64897 Archived-At: That's what I do in my own redefined `pp-eval-expression'. But I don't use (interactive "X") or (interactive "x"). I just use this: (interactive (list (read-from-minibuffer "Eval: " nil read-expression-map t 'read-expression-history)) Is there a problem with using that? That seems ok.