From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: pp-eval-expression broken
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:46:36 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H3OzU-0001h8-JP@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMKEBKCOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168141706 21996 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2007 03:48:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 03:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 07 04:48:25 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H3P1E-0002a1-BK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:48:24 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H3P1D-0005hL-NV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:48:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H3Ozv-0004bc-FR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:03 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H3Ozu-0004bA-TX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:03 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3Ozu-0004b3-NF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:02 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H3Ozu-0001lk-Eh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:47:02 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H3OzU-0001h8-JP; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:46:36 -0500
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMKEBKCOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64897
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/64897>

    That's what I do in my own redefined `pp-eval-expression'. But I don't use
    (interactive "X") or (interactive "x"). I just use this:

    (interactive
     (list (read-from-minibuffer "Eval: " nil read-expression-map t
				 'read-expression-history))

    Is there a problem with using that?

That seems ok.