From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: commends in Python mode
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:54:24 -0500
Message-ID: <E1H31hQ-0000FO-Bq@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200612260030.49345.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
	<jwvps9u2huj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168052110 1461 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2007 02:55:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 02:55:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, pogonyshev@gmx.net
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 06 03:55:08 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H31i4-0007cC-W0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 03:55:05 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H31i4-0006ry-2f
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:55:04 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H31hr-0006rg-4Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:54:51 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H31hp-0006rI-8V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:54:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H31hp-0006rE-3Z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:54:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H31ho-0005oy-QY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:54:48 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1H31hQ-0000FO-Bq; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:54:24 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvps9u2huj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:57:03 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64849
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/64849>

    I believe you're just suffering the consequences of having
    parse-sexp-ignore-comments set to nil.  IMO it should always be set to t,
    but for some reason it defaults to nil.

After the release, we could try changing the default to t.