Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX

[Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>]

    > However, moving it into the AUCTeX repository creates a possible
    > specific risk.  Namely, the risk that AUCTeX contributors who have not
    > signed papers might put changes into RefTeX also.

    No, that risk does not exist.  We don't give CVS access to AUCTeX
    developers not having signed papers.  The assignment problems of
    AUCTeX only concern old code, and not all of it (for example,
    preview-latex, a subsystem of AUCTeX, is completely covered).

Ok, I am satisfied on this score.

    > Given that RefTeX has a separate repository already, I don't think
    > there is any harm in moving it, as such.  (I already said so.)

    It hasn't: Carsten has worked on it basically without version control
    or at least version logs at home.  He considered the history in the
    Emacs ChangeLog to be much more relevant than what he got himself.

In that case, I think this will be, to a certain extent, a step back.
But we can live with it.

So we can drop this topic.