From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco Potorti` Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] etags/ctags v22.0.92 break Linux kernel `make TAGS/tags` Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:42:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1166990491.2706.205.camel@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167785019 9856 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2007 00:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 00:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 03 01:43:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H1uEC-0006xR-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:43:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H1uEC-00025k-1Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:43:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H1uDy-00024y-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H1uDw-00024K-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H1uDw-00024H-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:43:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.119.192.4] (helo=mx2.isti.cnr.it) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H1uDv-0002OZ-4U; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from conversionlocal.isti.cnr.it by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.3-x3 #31251) id <01MBH47QY3YOA17WOX@mx.isti.cnr.it>; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:42:21 +0100 Original-Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it (tucano.isti.cnr.it [146.48.81.102]) by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.3-x3 #31251) with ESMTPS id <01MBH47NS33EA17YNR@mx.isti.cnr.it>; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:42:17 +0100 Original-Received: from pot by tucano.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H1uCu-00017d-8e; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:42:16 +0100 In-reply-to: Original-To: Eli Zaretskii X-INSM-ip-source: 146.48.81.102 Auth Optional-NoAuth X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64666 Archived-At: >> After checking the behaviour of Exuberant ctags, I decided to follow the >> same route and allow for duplicated tags in ctags mode. I added an >> undocumented option --no-duplicates, just for emergency, that may be >> deleted in a future release of Etags. I also undocumented the existing >> --no-warn option. >> >> If anyone wants to comment on this change, please let me know. > >Should this change in behavior be mentioned in etc/NEWS? I did not because the Emacs manual does not mention the ctags functionalities of etags at all. But maybe yes, since it is only a couple of lines in an already huge file, it probably makes sense.