From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] etags/ctags v22.0.92 break Linux kernel `make TAGS/tags` Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:46:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1166990491.2706.205.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167158597.2706.224.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167284920.2668.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1167510984.2668.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167529857 22494 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2006 01:50:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 31 02:50:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0pqa-0007xf-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:50:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0pqZ-0007ki-Rg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:50:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0pn8-0005DZ-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:47:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0pn7-0005CV-AW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0pn7-0005CJ-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H0pn6-0000ZE-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1H0pmr-0005HH-2p; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:46:57 -0500 Original-To: Don Mullis In-reply-to: <1167510984.2668.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from Don Mullis on Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:36:24 -0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64546 Archived-At: Judging only from my own modest user experience, the common large-file-warning-threshold seems adequate to the purpose. Perhaps now might be a good time to raise the default value, though. 10 meg seems like a reasonable value to me.