From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: How about a new pretest?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:30 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GyDFK-0008Tw-Ro@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0612180902t66279a71s3ed7096eb752f644@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wt4pccoo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <uk60pm086.fsf@gnu.org>
	<m3mz5kb3by.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1Gx14g-0000VF-7x@fencepost.gnu.org> <458A6643.4090500@gnu.org>
	<m3odpxmkna.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1GxXBZ-00087f-2w@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m38xh0939o.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166904924 23154 80.91.229.10 (23 Dec 2006 20:15:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:15:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 23 21:15:21 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1GyDH6-00006s-TP
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:15:21 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GyDH6-0004wd-Ax
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:15:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GyDFR-0003Wi-3R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:37 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GyDFQ-0003WS-LH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GyDFQ-0003WL-IP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GyDFQ-0006Ol-DC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:36 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1GyDFK-0008Tw-Ro; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:30 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m38xh0939o.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64168
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/64168>

    >                                              The reason is that improving
    > Emacs for Windows alone is not as important as improving it for free systems.

    IMO, it is not "improving for Windows alone" ... it is a matter of making
    the Windows port work like the other ports.  

Right, but that is lower priority than making Emacs work better on GNU.
I usually don't spend time on Windows issues myself, and I hope you too
will leave them to others.