From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: shell completion documentation
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:04:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Gvflp-00048D-Hr@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91mz5ql61p.fsf_-_@mo.msk.ru> (gin@mo.msk.ru)
The description with exactly that much detail has to exist, so that
maintainers can quickly get to it and not ask users to educate them on
package they are supposed to maintain. Perhaps the description is
indeed too detailed for regular user. Then it just should be placed
not in user manual, but elsewhere in emacs distribution, with
reference to it from manual.
Maybe you are right in this point. Which are the maintainers that
need to know this information? Is it maintainers of shell.el, or
maintainers of other parts of Emacs? If just shell.el, let's
put it in a comment. If maintainers of other parts, let's
put it in some doc string.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-16 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-06 20:32 comint loses prompt boundary Ilya N. Golubev
2006-09-06 20:41 ` comint loses prompt boundary in cvs, too Ilya N. Golubev
[not found] ` <E1GLRDD-0000mS-2D@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <59ejumjzz2.fsf@mo.msk.ru>
[not found] ` <E1GLjTm-0000cp-DO@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <843bazvd1b.fsf@mo.msk.ru>
[not found] ` <comint_field_movement_fix@mo.msk.ru>
2006-12-12 18:07 ` shell completion documentation [Re: comint loses prompt boundary] Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-12 18:08 ` field movement fix " Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-15 16:11 ` field movement fix: `NEWS' change Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-14 5:29 ` shell completion documentation [Re: comint loses prompt boundary] Richard Stallman
2006-12-14 17:51 ` shell completion documentation Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-15 21:24 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-15 23:48 ` bug reports vs manuals [Re: shell completion documentation] Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-16 20:04 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2006-12-18 19:06 ` shell completion documentation Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-20 13:00 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-20 20:59 ` what makes read it? [Re: shell completion documentation] Ilya N. Golubev
[not found] ` <mailman.1817.1166000505.2155.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-12-13 15:39 ` shell completion documentation [Re: comint loses prompt boundary] Miles Bader
2006-12-13 18:07 ` Ilya N. Golubev
2006-12-14 3:49 ` Miles Bader
2006-12-15 23:48 ` comint loses prompt boundary Ilya N. Golubev
2006-08-24 17:15 ` checking for fields Ilya N. Golubev
2006-08-25 20:25 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <02473b3c6f4154-gin@mo.msk.ru>
[not found] ` <02473b40868335-gin@mo.msk.ru>
2006-08-28 17:47 ` Ilya N. Golubev
2006-08-29 11:47 ` Richard Stallman
2006-08-29 20:30 ` pretest downloads [Re: checking for fields] Ilya N. Golubev
2006-08-30 17:58 ` Richard Stallman
2006-12-18 15:56 ` customizing inhibit-field-text-motion [Re: comint loses prompt boundary] Ilya N. Golubev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Gvflp-00048D-Hr@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.