From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: My tex file became chaos code without any sake when I reopen it.
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:31 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Gu8dP-0004xk-NY@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20061210135952.GA6086@localdomain>
	<m2irgiurha.fsf@ordesa.cs.uu.nl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165933862 16914 80.91.229.10 (12 Dec 2006 14:31:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:31:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 15:31:00 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Gu8eq-0001I1-Fi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:31:00 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gu8ep-0005zB-Oe
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:30:59 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gu8dS-0004jN-EN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:34 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Gu8dR-0004iH-Pq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu8dR-0004i6-J5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gu8dR-0005dC-I9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:33 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Gu8dP-0004xk-NY; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:29:31 -0500
Original-To: Piet van Oostrum <piet@cs.uu.nl>
In-reply-to: <m2irgiurha.fsf@ordesa.cs.uu.nl> (message from Piet van Oostrum
	on Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:06:57 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63628
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/63628>

Emacs as very sophisticated handling for malloc failure,
because it is very important not to corrupt files in such cases.

So if it fails in some specific case, please do NOT think of it as
something inevitable that you should ignore.  It isa bug we need
to debug and fix.