From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Font-lock in COMINT modes Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165627740 29748 80.91.229.10 (9 Dec 2006 01:29:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 01:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 02:28:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gsr1M-0000Jm-Ud for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2006 02:28:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsr1M-0005q8-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:28:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsqz1-0004h5-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsqyz-0004g2-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsqyz-0004fq-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gsqyz-0000Df-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:29 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1Gsqyx-0001z0-Eg; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:26:28 -0500 Original-To: JD Smith In-reply-to: (message from JD Smith on Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:00:30 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63484 Archived-At: Here is the change which altered the default behavior in comint modes. ---------------------------- revision 1.348 date: 2006-09-28 19:09:19 +0000; author: rms; state: Exp; lines: +4 -1 (comint-mode): Bind font-lock-defaults non-nil. ---------------------------- I'm sure I did this to fix a bug, but I can't find any discussion about it. Maybe it was so facemenu-enable-faces-p would return nil. As far as I can see, if font-lock-defaults is nil, that is equivalent to (nil). How do you conclude that nil would be equivalent to (nil t)? But that is a side issue. If the value (nil t) is better, we can switch to it. Do people agree it is better?