From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using strcasecmp in xterm.c Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:02:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165539688 28750 80.91.229.10 (8 Dec 2006 01:01:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 01:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 08 02:01:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GsU7B-0002HC-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:01:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsU7B-0006ie-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:01:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GsU71-0006iY-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GsU6z-0006iM-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GsU6z-0006iJ-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [150.29.246.133] (helo=mx1.aist.go.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GsU6y-0007PH-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id kB8112ER028607; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:01:02 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id kB8111Hp013545; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:01:01 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id kB8110XS020333; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:01:00 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GsU82-0002Ox-16; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:02:18 +0900 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.91 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63441 Archived-At: In article , storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: >>> Shouldn't this use xstricmp which is specifically defined to compare >>> fontnames according to the comment in xfaces.c ? > > > > What is the difference between xstricmp and strcasecmp? > I dunno -- but strcasecmp doesn't exist on all systems (I just learned > that), and xstricmp comes with Emacs, so it seems safer to use it. Ah, I see. I've just installed that change. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org