From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs hangs in jit-lock Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:21:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <456C70A0.6060105@gnu.org> <87k61fibk5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <456C9877.7020905@gnu.org> <20061130001202.GB21945@printf.se> <87mz64tsw7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165242140 10430 80.91.229.10 (4 Dec 2006 14:22:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: henrik.enberg@telia.com, sds@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 15:22:18 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GrEhy-0007yk-O9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:22:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrEhy-0006vu-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:22:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GrEhf-0006se-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GrEhe-0006sA-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrEhe-0006s6-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GrEhe-0001tF-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1GrEhd-0005uz-92; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:21:53 -0500 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <87mz64tsw7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:19:04 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63269 Archived-At: It's not trivial to quantify how much power drain stealth fontification produces. On laptops with acpi, you can see the amount of power drain. However, maybe it is true that stealth fontification is not needed any more with jit-lock.