From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs hangs in jit-lock
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:56:26 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GqZ6A-0000cm-5T@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <456C70A0.6060105@gnu.org> <87k61fibk5.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<456C9877.7020905@gnu.org> <20061130001202.GB21945@printf.se>
	<jwv64cxy3aa.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165082397 24068 80.91.229.2 (2 Dec 2006 17:59:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 17:59:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: henrik.enberg@telia.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, sds@gnu.org,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 02 18:59:54 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqZ9L-0001Xb-D0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:59:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqZ9L-0007sZ-31
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:59:43 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqZ6B-0004Pe-Tf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:56:27 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqZ6B-0004PL-Ge
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:56:27 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqZ6B-0004PG-8L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:56:27 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GqZ6B-0004rt-AI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:56:27 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GqZ6A-0000cm-5T; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:56:26 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwv64cxy3aa.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:21:48 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63230
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/63230>

    A non-nil setting may be useful for some situations, but nil is safer and
    more desirable for laptop use which is becoming the more prevalent
    machines nowadays.

Have people found that a non-nil value causes a significant increase
in power drain?