From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: make mostlyclean
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:21 -0500
Message-ID: <E1GqGRd-0002Xq-Ds@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jo8xhundjy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1GprtR-0006Zw-5S@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ypirgw1frq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165010508 14526 80.91.229.2 (1 Dec 2006 22:01:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:01:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 01 23:01:46 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqGRr-0008NJ-RU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:01:36 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqGRr-0008Uq-BI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:35 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqGRg-0008UF-Mj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:24 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GqGRe-0008Ts-F3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqGRe-0008Tp-AJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:22 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GqGRd-00062h-TB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:21 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GqGRd-0002Xq-Ds; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:21 -0500
Original-To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <ypirgw1frq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:00:57 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63205
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/63205>

    If bootstrap-emacs gets deleted, surely emacs-22.0.91 (without ".1" at
    the end) should too?

That would be logical, I agree.